> > > I doubt everyone would like trading query speed for insert/update 
> > > speed plus index size
> > 
> > If he is scanning through the entire index, he could do a sequential
> > scan of the table, grab all the tid transaction status values, and use
> > those when viewing the index.  No need to store/update the transaction
> > status in the index that way.
> 
> Huh ? How ? It is how you do it now. Do you expect
> load several milion transaction statuses into memory,
> then scan index and lookup these values ?
> Missed I something ?
> devik
> 
> 

Not sure.  I figured they were pretty small values.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Reply via email to