Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> >
> > TODO:
> > - add HeapTupleHeaderData into each IndexTupleData
> > - change code to reflect above
> > - when deleting-updating heap then also update tuples'
> > HeapTupleHeaderData in indices
>
> I doubt everyone would like trading query speed for insert/update
> speed plus index size
>
> Perhaps this could be implemented as a special type of index which
> you must explicitly specify at create time ?
>
> > The last step could be done in two ways. First by limiting
> > number of indices for one table we can store coresponding
> > indices' TIDs in each heap tuple. The update is then simple
> > taking one disk write.
>
> Why limit it ? One could just save an tid array in each tuple .
>
Indice's TIDs are transient.
Isn't it useless to store indice's TIDs ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan devik
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new i... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new i... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my n... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with ... devik
- [HACKERS] Deep Trouble Abe Asghar
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my n... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my n... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with ... Devik
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster w... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times fas... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times... Devik
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new i... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new i... Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my n... Hannu Krosing