Of course, if an alias for ichar is carried forward I can write code for the current postgres that won't break with future releases. I realize that I might end up being the only person on the planet who ends up using ichar, and that may not be sufficient justification for an alias.... Best, Alex --- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > New proposal: forget ichar(), give the function two > entries chr() and > char(). > > regards, tom lane __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conver... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character c... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to charact... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to charact... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to charact... The Hermit Hacker
- odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] ascii... Karel Zak
- Re: odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] a... Tom Lane
- Re: odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] a... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in postgres Alex Sokoloff