On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > sounds good to me ... chr() == char(), I take it? is there a reason for > > having both vs just changing char() to chr() in the odbc stuff? > > We don't control the ODBC specification ... okay, granted, but, other then ODBC, do we need the char() type? could it not be an internal translation in the ODBC driver itself?
- [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in postgres Alex Sokoloff
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in post... Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion... Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conver... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character c... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to charact... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to cha... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to cha... Tom Lane
- odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] a... The Hermit Hacker
- odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] a... Karel Zak
- Re: odbc (was: Re: [HACKER... Tom Lane
- Re: odbc (was: Re: [HACKER... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conver... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in post... Alex Sokoloff