On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > sounds good to me ... chr() == char(), I take it?  is there a reason for
> > having both vs just changing char() to chr() in the odbc stuff?
> 
> We don't control the ODBC specification ...

okay, granted, but, other then ODBC, do we need the char() type?  could it
not be an internal translation in the ODBC driver itself?


Reply via email to