On Mon, Nov 9, 2026 at 11:11 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <[email protected]> writes: > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2026 at 9:37 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hmph. I read that and I was like "so what?". Why would users need > >> to know that? How likely is it that anyone would issue such a > >> combined command in the first place? > > > I agree that it is less likely for users to use such a combination and > > even if they use I don't think it is a big deal. We can leave > > mentioning anything about such a combination. > > To be clear, that was an honest request for information. I don't > understand why this point is worth space in the release notes. > But if you think it is, educate me. We still have a little time > to adjust the notes ... >
This was an unintended behavior (resetting slot's two_phase property when user tries to mark two_phase for a subscription where two_phase was already set) which was previously working and has the risk of the same bugs as noted in the commit message. I don't know if in practice any one would be using such a combination, so it is not clear to me if there is a need to mention it in release notes. We can wait and see if Bertrand has any thoughts on the same. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
