Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 10/2/21 5:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> IIUC, the only problem for a non-updated animal would be that it'd >> run the test twice? Or would it actually fail? If the latter, >> we'd need to sit on the patch rather longer.
> The patch removes test.sh, so yes it would break.
Maybe we could leave test.sh in place for awhile? I'd rather
not cause a flag day for buildfarm owners. (Also, how do we
see this working in the back branches?)
regards, tom lane
