On 10/2/21 5:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> I haven't looked at the patch closely yet, but from a buildfarm POV I >> think the only thing that needs to be done is to inhibit the buildfarm >> client module if the TAP tests are present. The buildfarm code that runs >> TAP tests should automatically detect and run the new test. >> I've just counted and there are 116 animals reporting check-pg_upgrade, >> so we'd better put that out pronto. It's a little early but I'll try to >> push out a release containing code for it on Monday or Tuesday (it's a >> one line addition). > IIUC, the only problem for a non-updated animal would be that it'd > run the test twice? Or would it actually fail? If the latter, > we'd need to sit on the patch rather longer. > >
The patch removes test.sh, so yes it would break. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
