On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:53 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think it is a bad idea to print additional information as you > are suggesting but why only for this error? It could be useful to > investigate any other error we get during decoding. I think normally > we add such additional information via error_context. We have recently > added/enhanced it for apply-workers, see commit [1]. > > I think here we should just print the relation name in the error > message you pointed out and then work on adding additional information > via error context as a separate patch. What do you think? >
Attached please find the patch which just modifies the current error message as proposed by you. I am planning to commit it in a day or two unless there are comments or any other suggestions. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
v1-0001-Add-parent-table-name-in-an-error-in-reorderbuffe.patch
Description: Binary data