On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:54 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > From Friday, September 10, 2021 10:33 AM Hou Zhijie<houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> > wrote: > > Besides, If we don't want to use a new flag to distinguish tablename and > schemaname, > We can only check the NodeTag to distinguish the difference. > > Attach two diff patches based on the latest schema patch > which change the code with a flag and without a flag. >
I would prefer a version without additional flags unless you think it is difficult to extend it in the future for other objects like sequences which as far as I can see shouldn't be the case. Is there a reason to define pubobj_name similar to any_name? If so, then please do add the comments. One reason I could think of is that any_name is not used for schema names currently which might have motivated you to define a separate naming convention for publication. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
