On 9/5/21, 12:14 PM, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Bossart, Nathan" <bossa...@amazon.com> writes: >> Is there a specific style you have in mind for this change, or is your >> point that the CASE statement should only be reserved for when >> is_default_acl is true? > > I'd be inclined to split this logic out into a separate if-statement, > along the lines of
Got it, thanks. Nathan
