On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:31 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 09:32:41AM +1000, Peter Smith wrote: > > Hi. I noticed some code that seems the same as the nearby function > > unpack_sql_state, and I wondered why it is not just calling it? > > This looks like a piece that could have been done in d46bc44, and > would not matter performance-wise. No objections from here to do > this simplification.
Thanks. Do you want me to re-post it as a patch attachment? ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
