On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 09:32:41AM +1000, Peter Smith wrote: > Hi. I noticed some code that seems the same as the nearby function > unpack_sql_state, and I wondered why it is not just calling it?
This looks like a piece that could have been done in d46bc44, and would not matter performance-wise. No objections from here to do this simplification. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
