> On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:43, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 21:38, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se > <mailto:dan...@yesql.se>> a écrit : > > On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:09, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us > > <mailto:br...@momjian.us>> wrote: > > > Basically, pg_upgrade has avoided any backend changes that could be > > controlled by GUCs and I am not sure we want to start adding such > > changes for just this. > > In principle I think it’s sound to try to avoid backend changes where possible > without sacrificing robustness. > > I agree, but it seems quite more likely that an extension relying on a > bgworker changes this guc, compared to an extension forcing autovacuum to be > on for instance.
Agreed, in this particular case I think there is merit to the idea of enforcing it in the backend. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
