Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 21:38, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> a écrit :
> > On 26 Aug 2021, at 15:09, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > Basically, pg_upgrade has avoided any backend changes that could be > > controlled by GUCs and I am not sure we want to start adding such > > changes for just this. > > In principle I think it’s sound to try to avoid backend changes where > possible > without sacrificing robustness. > I agree, but it seems quite more likely that an extension relying on a bgworker changes this guc, compared to an extension forcing autovacuum to be on for instance. >
