> On Aug 9, 2021, at 7:20 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > So I took another look at the code, and it doesn't seem that hard > to make it act this way. The attached passes regression, but > I've not beat on it with random strings. I expect to get back around to testing this in a day or so. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improv... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improvement: skip useless pa... Robert Haas