> On Aug 9, 2021, at 6:17 PM, Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Well, this doesn't die either: Meaning it doesn't die in the part of the pattern qualified by {0} either. It does die in the other part. Sorry again for the confusion. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Mark Dilger
- Re: Another regexp performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: Another regexp performance improvement: skip useless paren... Robert Haas