On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 6:47 PM Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 1:37 AM Thomas Munro <[email protected]> wrote: > > I pushed 0001. > > That's great. I just realized that this leaves us with identical > RequestCheckpoint() calls in two nearby places. Is there any reason > not to further simplify as in the attached? > +1, also, can we just get rid off "promoted" flag? The only inconvenience is we might need to check three flags instead of one to perform the checkpoint at the end.
- Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recove... Aleksander Alekseev
- Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash r... Robert Haas
- Re: Background writer and checkpointer in cra... Andres Freund
- Re: Background writer and checkpointer in... Robert Haas
- RE: Background writer and checkpointe... Jakub Wartak
- Re: Background writer and checkp... Robert Haas
- Re: Background writer and checkpointer in cra... Thomas Munro
- Re: Background writer and checkpointer in... Robert Haas
- Re: Background writer and checkpointe... Amul Sul
- Re: Background writer and checkp... Robert Haas
- Re: Background writer and checkpointe... Thomas Munro
- Re: Background writer and checkp... Thomas Munro
