Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> writes:
> I think int64 is in most cases the counterpart of *long* on Windows.
I'm not particularly on board with s/long/int64/g as a universal
solution. I think that most of these usages are concerned with
memory sizes and would be better off as "size_t". We might need
int64 in places where we're concerned with sums of memory usage
across processes, or where the value needs to be allowed to be
negative. So it'll take case-by-case analysis to do it right.
BTW, one aspect of this that I'm unsure how to tackle is the
common usage of "L" constants; in particular, "work_mem * 1024L"
is a really common idiom that we'll need to get rid of. Not sure
that grep will be a useful aid for finding those.
regards, tom lane
