Em dom., 25 de jul. de 2021 às 13:28, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2021-07-23 17:15:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> That's because they spill to disk where they did not before. The easy > >> answer of "raise hash_mem_multiplier" doesn't help, because on Windows > >> the product of work_mem and hash_mem_multiplier is clamped to 2GB, > >> thanks to the ancient decision to do a lot of memory-space-related > >> calculations in "long int", which is only 32 bits on Win64. > > > We really ought to just remove every single use of long. > > I have no objection to that as a long-term goal. But I'm not volunteering > to do all the work, and in any case it wouldn't be a back-patchable fix. > I'm a volunteer, if you want to work together. I think int64 is in most cases the counterpart of *long* on Windows. regards, Ranier Vilela
