On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:55 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see here we have a mix of opinions from various people. Dilip seems > to be favoring the approach where we provide some option to the user > for partitioned tables and automatic behavior for non-partitioned > tables but he also seems to have mild concerns about this behavior. > OTOH, Greg and Hou-San seem to favor an approach where we can provide > an option to the user for both partitioned and non-partitioned tables. > I am also in favor of providing an option to the user for the sake of > consistency in behavior and not trying to introduce a special kind of > invalidation as it doesn't serve the purpose for partitioned tables. > Robert seems to be in favor of automatic behavior but it is not very > clear to me if he is fine with dealing differently for partitioned and > non-partitioned relations. Robert, can you please provide your opinion > on what do you think is the best way to move forward here?
I thought we had agreed on handling partitioned and unpartitioned tables differently, but maybe I misunderstood the discussion. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
