‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Thursday, July 15th, 2021 at 14:35, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> 
wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 08:35:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:

>
> > 2.  curculio:
> > Looking at the OpenBSD code (usr.bin/compress/main.c), long options
> > are supported, where --version does exit(0) without printing
> > set_outfile() is doing a discard of the file suffixes it does not
> > recognize, and I think that their implementation bumps on .gz.partial
> > and generates an exit code of 512 to map with WARNING. I still wish
> > to keep this test, and I'd like to think that the contents of
> > @zlib_wals are enough in terms of coverage. What do you think?
>
> After thinking more about this one, I have taken the course to just
> remove the .gz.partial segment from the check, a full segment should
> be enough in terms of coverage. I prefer this simplification over a
> rename of the .partial segment or a tweak of the error code to map
> with WARNING.

Fair enough.

Cheers,
//Georgios

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Michael


Reply via email to