On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:26 PM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It seems strange to add a comment to explain why it's there. If we're > > going to the trouble of doing that, then we should just remove it and > > add a very small comment to mention why INT8 sequences don't need to > > be checked. > > Any thoughts on this, Greg? >
The patch LGTM (it's the same as my original patch but with short comments). Regards, Greg Nancarrow Fujitsu Australia
