On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 00:06, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think if you're going to reject this patch, a brief comment should > be added to that code to justify why that existing superfluous check > is worthwhile.
It seems strange to add a comment to explain why it's there. If we're going to the trouble of doing that, then we should just remove it and add a very small comment to mention why INT8 sequences don't need to be checked. Patch attached David
remove_surplus_int8_seq_range_check.patch
Description: Binary data
