On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 4:59 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > So I would finish with the attached, close enough to what Quan has > sent upthread.
Thanks. The patch looks good to me, except a minor comment - isn't it "int2 for these fields" as the fields still exist? + /* pageinspect >= 1.10 uses int4 instead of int2 for those fields */ Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
