On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 12:49:25AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Since we're already past beta2, I'm not sure that's a good idea. We > can't really treat pageinspect 1.9 as something that the world has > never seen.
Yeah, that's why I would object to new changes in 1.9 and REL_14_STABLE. So my take would be to just have 1.10, and do those changes on HEAD. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
