On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 10:08 AM Arne Roland <a.rol...@index.de> wrote:
> *From:* Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > *Sent:* Saturday, June 26, 2021 18:36 > *Subject:* Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables > > > I'll have a look during the commitfest which starts late next week. > > Thank you! > > > (However, I'm fairly sure that it won't be in released versions ... > > it'll only be fixed in the version to be released next year, postgres > > 15. Things that are clear bug fixes can be applied > > in released versions, but this patch probably changes behavior in ways > > that are not acceptable in released versions. Sorry about that.) > > I never expected any backports. Albeit I don't know anyone, who would > mind, I agree with you on that assessment. This is very annoying, but not > really breaking the product. > > Sure, I was hoping for pg14 initially. But I will survive another year of > gexec. > I am grateful you agreed to have a look! > > Regards > Arne > > Hi, Arne: It seems the patch no longer applies cleanly on master branch. Do you mind updating the patch ? Thanks 1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/backend/commands/trigger.c.rej patching file src/backend/parser/gram.y Hunk #1 succeeded at 8886 (offset 35 lines). patching file src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c.rej
