> On Jun 20, 2021, at 8:09 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Because currently, we don't proceed after an error unless it is > resolved. Why do you think there could be multiple such transactions? Just as one example, if the subscriber has a unique index that the publisher lacks, any number of transactions could add non-unique data that then fails to apply on the subscriber. My patch took the view that the user should figure out how to get the subscriber side consistent with the publisher side, but if you instead take the approach that problematic commits should be skipped, it would seem that arbitrarily many such transactions could be committed on the publisher side. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Re: Optionally automatically disable logical replication s... Amit Kapila
- Re: Optionally automatically disable logical replicat... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically disable logical repl... Amit Kapila
- Re: Optionally automatically disable logical ... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically disable logi... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically disable logi... Masahiko Sawada
- Re: Optionally automatically disable... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Amit Kapila
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Masahiko Sawada
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Amit Kapila
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Amit Kapila
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Amit Kapila
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Amit Kapila
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Peter Smith
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Mark Dilger
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Amit Kapila
- Re: Optionally automatically dis... Mark Dilger