On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 1:06 AM Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2021, at 9:47 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We are also discussing another action like skipping the apply of the > > transaction on an error [1]. I think it is better to evaluate both the > > proposals as one seems to be an extension of another. > > Thanks for the link. > > I think they are two separate options. >
Right, but there are things that could be common from the design perspective. For example, why is it mandatory to update this conflict ( error) information in the system catalog instead of displaying it via some stats view? Also, why not also log the xid of the failed transaction? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
