> On Jun 14, 2021, at 7:46 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > Does anyone else have an opinion on this? Of course I can easily add a > GUC. But I won't do so in the absence of any real argument in favor of > it. I'd want to see some evidence that the GUC is necessary. (For that matter, why is a per relation setting necessary?) Is there a reproducible pathological case, perhaps with a pgbench script, to demonstrate the need? I'm not asking whether there might be some regression, but rather whether somebody wants to construct a worst-case pathological case and publish quantitative results about how bad it is. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out of HOT in... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out of H... Michael Paquier
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out ... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most ... Mark Dilger
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the m... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out of H... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out of H... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out ... Masahiko Sawada
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most ... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the m... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most out ... Justin Pryzby
- Re: Teaching users how they can get the most ... Peter Geoghegan