On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 6:30 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Another concern with this approach is what it > > means for the VACUUM command itself. I haven't added an 'auto' > > spelling that is accepted by the VACUUM command in this POC version. > > But do I need to at all? Can that just be implied by not having any > > INDEX_CLEANUP option? > > It seems to me that it's better to have INDEX_CLEANUP option of VACUUM > command support AUTO for consistency. Do you have any concerns about > supporting it?
I suppose we should have it. But now we have to teach vacuumdb about this new boolean-like enum too. It's a lot more new code than I would have preferred, but I suppose that it makes sense. -- Peter Geoghegan
