On 6/12/21 1:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 6/12/21 1:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> OK. But it makes me itch a bit that this one wait-for-wal-to-be- >>> processed query looks different from all the other ones. >> I'm happy to bring the other two queries that look like this into line >> with this one if you like. > I see a lot more than two --- grepping for poll_query_until with > a test involving a LSN comparison finds a bunch. Are we sure that > there are only three in which the LSN could be null?
Well, I'm counting places that specifically compare it with pg_stat_archiver.last_archived_wal. > How much > does it really matter if it is? > > It makes it harder to tell if there was any result at all when there's a failure. If it bugs you that much I can revert just that line. Now that I have fixed the immediate issue it matters less. I'm not prepared to put in a lot of effort here, though. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
