On 6/12/21 1:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 6/12/21 10:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I wonder whether that is a workaround for the poll_query_until bug >>> I proposed to fix at [1]. >> No, it's because I found it annoying and confusing that there was an >> invisible result when last_archived_wal is null. > OK. But it makes me itch a bit that this one wait-for-wal-to-be- > processed query looks different from all the other ones. > >
I'm happy to bring the other two queries that look like this into line with this one if you like. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
