On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:22 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:54 PM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It looks like for some of the fsm_set_and_search calls whose return > > value is ignored (in fsm_search and RecordPageWithFreeSpace), there's > > no (void). Is it intentional? In the code base, we generally have > > (void) when non-void return value of a function is ignored. > > That's a good practice, +1 for changing that.
Thanks. PSA v1 patch. With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
v1-0001-Use-void-when-return-value-of-fsm_set_and_search-.patch
Description: Binary data
