On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:24 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > It looks like for some of the fsm_set_and_search calls whose return > value is ignored (in fsm_search and RecordPageWithFreeSpace), there's > no (void). Is it intentional?
Basically, fsm_set_and_search, serve both "set" and "search", but it only search if the "minValue" is > 0. So if the minvalue is passed as 0 then the return value is ignored intentionally. I can see in both places where the returned value is ignored the minvalue is passed as 0. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
