David, >> Thanks for working on that. I had a look and wondered if it might be >> better to go into slightly less details about the exact atomic >> function to use. The wording there might lead you to believe you can >> just call the atomic function on the non-atomic variable. >> >> It might be best just to leave the details about how exactly to use >> atomics by just referencing port/atomics.h. >> >> Maybe something like the attached? > > Thanks. Agreed and your patch looks good to me. > >> I'm also a bit on the fence if this should be backpatched or not. The >> reasons though maybe not is that it seems unlikely maybe people would >> not be working in master if they're developing something new. On the >> other side of the argument, 0ccebe779, which adjusts another README >> was backpatched. I'm leaning towards backpatching. > > Me too. Let's backpatch.
Would you like to push the patch? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
