> Thanks for working on that. I had a look and wondered if it might be > better to go into slightly less details about the exact atomic > function to use. The wording there might lead you to believe you can > just call the atomic function on the non-atomic variable. > > It might be best just to leave the details about how exactly to use > atomics by just referencing port/atomics.h. > > Maybe something like the attached?
Thanks. Agreed and your patch looks good to me. > I'm also a bit on the fence if this should be backpatched or not. The > reasons though maybe not is that it seems unlikely maybe people would > not be working in master if they're developing something new. On the > other side of the argument, 0ccebe779, which adjusts another README > was backpatched. I'm leaning towards backpatching. Me too. Let's backpatch. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
