On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:30 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > + * We'll prefer to consider this join async-capable if > > > any table from > > > + * either side of the join is considered async-capable. > > > + */ > > > + fpinfo->async_capable = fpinfo_o->async_capable || > > > + fpinfo_i->async_capable; > I updated the above comment so that it explains the reason. Please > find attached a patch. I did some cleanup as well: I have committed the patch. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
