Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On Mar 12, 2021, at 10:36 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> You might think about using some symmetric-but-not-zero value, >> 0x01010101 or the like.
> I thought about that, but I'm not sure that it proves much more than just
> using zero.
Perhaps not. I haven't really looked at any of this code, so I'll defer
to Robert's judgment about whether this represents an interesting testing
issue.
regards, tom lane
