On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 10:39:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Okay, cool.  I'd rather wait more for Peter before doing anything, so
> if there are no objections, I'll look at that stuff again at the
> beginning of next week and perhaps apply it.  If you wish to take care
> of that yourself, please feel free to do so, of course.

So, I have looked at the proposed patch in details, fixed the
documentation of pg_stat_ssl where compression was still listed,
checked a couple of things with and without OpenSSL, across past major
PG versions with OpenSSL 1.0.2 to see if compression was getting
disabled correctly.  And things look all good, so applied.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to