Thanks !

Le mar. 2 mars 2021 à 04:10, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:29 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the
> > > documentation.  The final outcome is that it can be difficult to
> > > monitor the archiver state in such case.  That's orthogonal to this
> > > patch but maybe we can add a new "archiver_start" timestamptz column
> > > in pg_stat_archiver, so monitoring tools can detect a problem if it's
> > > too far away from pg_postmaster_start_time() for instance?
> >
> > There may be other solutions as well.  I have applied the doc patch
> > for now.
>
> Thanks!
>

Reply via email to