On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:29 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the > > documentation. The final outcome is that it can be difficult to > > monitor the archiver state in such case. That's orthogonal to this > > patch but maybe we can add a new "archiver_start" timestamptz column > > in pg_stat_archiver, so monitoring tools can detect a problem if it's > > too far away from pg_postmaster_start_time() for instance? > > There may be other solutions as well. I have applied the doc patch > for now.
Thanks!
