On 2021-02-08 14:26, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/02/08 13:01, Fujii Masao wrote:


On 2021/02/05 8:45, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
I pgindented the patches.

Thanks for updating the patches!

+       <function>XLogWrite</function>, which nomally called by an
+       <function>issue_xlog_fsync</function>, which nomally called by an

Typo: "nomally" should be "normally"?

+       <function>XLogFlush</function> request(see <xref linkend="wal-configuration"/>) +       <function>XLogFlush</function> request(see <xref linkend="wal-configuration"/>),

Isn't it better to add a space character just after "request"?

+                    INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(duration);
+                    INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(duration, start);
+                    WalStats.m_wal_write_time = INSTR_TIME_GET_MICROSEC(duration);

If several cycles happen in the do-while loop, m_wal_write_time should be updated with the sum of "duration" in those cycles instead of "duration" in the last cycle? If yes, "+=" should be used instead of "=" when updating
m_wal_write_time?

+            INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(duration);
+            INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(duration, start);
+            WalStats.m_wal_sync_time = INSTR_TIME_GET_MICROSEC(duration);

Also "=" should be "+=" in the above?

+               /* Send WAL statistics */
+               pgstat_send_wal();

This may cause overhead in WAL-writing by walwriter because it's called
every cycles even when walwriter needs to write more WAL next cycle
(don't need to sleep on WaitLatch)? If this is right, pgstat_send_wal()
should be called only when WaitLatch() returns with WL_TIMEOUT?

Thanks, I didn't notice that.
I'll fix it.

-       <function>XLogFlush</function> request(see <xref
linkend="wal-configuration"/>)
+       <function>XLogFlush</function> request(see <xref
linkend="wal-configuration"/>),
+       or WAL data written out to disk by WAL receiver.

So regarding walreceiver, only wal_write, wal_write_time, wal_sync, and
wal_sync_time are updated even while the other values are not. Isn't this confusing to users? If so, what about reporting those walreceiver stats in
pg_stat_wal_receiver?

OK, I'll add new infrastructure code to interect with wal receiver
and stats collector and show the stats in pg_stat_wal_receiver.

                                if (endofwal)
+                               {
+                                       /* Send WAL statistics to the stats 
collector */
+                                       pgstat_send_wal();
                                        break;

You added pgstat_send_wal() so that it's called in some cases where
walreceiver exits. But ISTM that there are other walreceiver-exit cases.
For example, in the case where SIGTERM is received. Instead,
pgstat_send_wal() should be called in WalRcvDie() for those all cases?

Thanks, I forgot the case.
I'll fix it.

Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION


Reply via email to