On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 07:42:02PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Please note that on a related thread that I have begun yesterday, > > Heikki has suggested some changes in the way we handle the opaque data > > used by each cryptohash implementation. > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6ebe7f1f-bf37-2688-2ac1-a081d2783...@iki.fi > > > > As the design used on this thread for HMAC is similar to what I did > > for cryptohashes, it would be good to conclude first on the interface > > there, and then come back here so as a consistent design is used. As > > a whole, I don't think that there is any need to rush for this stuff. > > I would rather wait more and make sure that we agree on an interface > > people are happy enough with. > > Others are waiting to continue working. I am not going to hold up a > patch over a one function, two-line API issue. I will deal with > whatever new API you choose, and mine will work fine using the OpenSSL > API until I do.
I will also point out that my patch is going to be bigger and bigger, and harder to review, the longer I work on it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
