On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:48:00AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Great. See my questions in the key manager thread about whether I > should use the init/update/final API or just keep the one-line version. > As far as when to commit this, I think the quiet time is actually better > because if you break something, it is less of a disruption while you fix > it.
Please note that on a related thread that I have begun yesterday, Heikki has suggested some changes in the way we handle the opaque data used by each cryptohash implementation. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6ebe7f1f-bf37-2688-2ac1-a081d2783...@iki.fi As the design used on this thread for HMAC is similar to what I did for cryptohashes, it would be good to conclude first on the interface there, and then come back here so as a consistent design is used. As a whole, I don't think that there is any need to rush for this stuff. I would rather wait more and make sure that we agree on an interface people are happy enough with. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature