On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 02:34:26PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2020-12-02 15:04, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> I do wonder if it'd be a good idea to move the syscall >> name itself out of the message, too; that would reduce the number of >> messages to translate 50x to just "%s(%s) failed: %m" instead of one >> message per distinct syscall. > > Seems useful, but perhaps as a separate project.
- elog(LOG, "getsockname() failed: %m");
+ ereport(LOG,
+ (errmsg("getsockname() failed: %m")));
FWIW, I disagree with the approach taken by eb93f3a. As of HEAD, it
is now required to translate all those strings. I think that it would
have been better to remove the function names from all those error
messages and not require the same pattern to be translated N times.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
