On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:26 PM Fujii Masao
<masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
> >  > > When I read the patch again, I found that, with the patch, the shutdown
> >  > > of worker_spi causes to report the following FATAL message.
> >  > >
> >  > >      FATAL:  terminating connection due to administrator command
> >  > >
> >  > > Isn't this message confusing because it's not a connection? If so,
> >  > > we need to update ProcessInterrupts() so that the proper message is
> >  > > reported like other bgworkers do.
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  > This is also true for all the bgworker that use the die() handler. How 
> > about doing it the way bgworker_die() does in ProcessInterrupts()? This 
> > would give meaningful information. Thoughts? If okay, I can make a separate 
> > patch.
> >  >
> >
> > Attaching the patch that improved the message for bg workers in 
> > ProcessInterrupts(). For instance, now it looks like *FATAL:  terminating 
> > background worker "worker_spi" due to administrator command* or *FATAL:  
> > terminating background worker "parallel worker" due to administrator 
> > command *and so on for other bg workers.*
> > *
> >
> > Please review the patch.
>
> Thanks for the patch! It looks good to me.
>

Thanks!

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


Reply via email to