On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:26 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > > > > > When I read the patch again, I found that, with the patch, the shutdown > > > > of worker_spi causes to report the following FATAL message. > > > > > > > > FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command > > > > > > > > Isn't this message confusing because it's not a connection? If so, > > > > we need to update ProcessInterrupts() so that the proper message is > > > > reported like other bgworkers do. > > > > > > > > > > This is also true for all the bgworker that use the die() handler. How > > about doing it the way bgworker_die() does in ProcessInterrupts()? This > > would give meaningful information. Thoughts? If okay, I can make a separate > > patch. > > > > > > > Attaching the patch that improved the message for bg workers in > > ProcessInterrupts(). For instance, now it looks like *FATAL: terminating > > background worker "worker_spi" due to administrator command* or *FATAL: > > terminating background worker "parallel worker" due to administrator > > command *and so on for other bg workers.* > > * > > > > Please review the patch. > > Thanks for the patch! It looks good to me. >
Thanks! With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com