On 2020-Nov-23, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > Well, we already do this in a number of places. But I can get behind > > this: > > >> Maybe it'd be a good idea to have elog.c expose a new function > >> along the lines of "bool message_level_is_interesting(int elevel)" > >> to support this and similar future optimizations in a less fragile way. > > I'll see about a patch for that.
Looking at that now ...
