Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > Well, we already do this in a number of places. But I can get behind > this:
>> Maybe it'd be a good idea to have elog.c expose a new function >> along the lines of "bool message_level_is_interesting(int elevel)" >> to support this and similar future optimizations in a less fragile way. I'll see about a patch for that. regards, tom lane