(Adding previous reviewers to CC) On 2020-Nov-03, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Given the caveats around blocking mode connections why not just require > non-blocking mode, in a similar fashion to how synchronous functions are > disallowed? This is a very good question. Why indeed? Does anybody have a good answer to this? If not, I propose we just require that non-blocking mode is in use in order for batch mode to be used. I've been doing a review pass over this patch and have an updated version, which I intend to share later today (after I fix what appears to be a misunderstanding in the "singlerow" test in testlibpqbatch.c)
