Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:56 AM Mark Dilger
> <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> hornet is still unhappy even after
>>> 321633e17b07968e68ca5341429e2c8bbf15c331?
>> That appears to be a failed test for pg_surgery rather than for amcheck. Or
>> am I reading the log wrong?
> Oh, yeah, you're right. I don't know why it just failed now, though:
> there are a bunch of successful runs preceding it. But I guess it's
> unrelated to this thread.
pg_surgery's been unstable since it went in. I believe Andres is
working on a fix.
regards, tom lane
